this link is to an external site that may or may not meet accessibility guidelines.
this link is to an external site that may or may not meet accessibility guidelines.
I’m a triple-vaccinated researcher hoping to attend a conference in Portugal in July. Since Portugal doesn’t recognise Australian vaccination certificates might I be turned around or quarantined? When will Portugal recognise Australia’s vaccine certificates, when will we be allowed to join the EU Digital COVID Certificate system and when will Portugal reopen to Australian travellers? A Dennis, Fortitude Valley QLD
Compared with other western European countries, Portugal has been slow to allow Australians to enter for leisure travel. Since the advice on the official website is unclear, I requested clarification from the Portuguese Consulate in Sydney. According to written advice from a spokesperson, “Direct travel from Australia is limited to essential purposes only (professional, study, family reunion and for health or humanitarian reasons), to be officially extended to all visitors shortly for non-essential travel. There is an ongoing process for the Australian COVID-19 vaccination certificates to be duly recognised in Portugal. You need a PCR test 72 hours before boarding.” Refer to the Visit Portugal website [visitportugal.com] for updates. The EU Digital COVID Certificate is not available to Australians since Australia’s International COVID Vaccine Certificate uses a different format from that approved by the European Commission.
My husband and I have six days in between family engagements in the UK in December. We will be in Cookham and would like to visit Bath and York, can we do both by train? We need to be in Birmingham on December 22. B. Corrigan, Mittagong NSW
From Cookham, in Berkshire, Bath is just over 90 minutes away by frequent train services. Bath to York is just over four hours and York to Birmingham is 2½ hours.
Unless York is an absolute must, I’d be inclined to spend the whole six nights in Bath and use this World Heritage-listed city as a base for exploring one of the loveliest parts of England. Right on your doorstep you’ve got Glastonbury, Stratford-upon-Avon and Wells Cathedral, a Gothic beauty and major pilgrimage site since medieval times. Just to the north are the storybook villages of The Cotswolds – Moreton-in-March, Bourton-on-the-Water and Stow-on-the-Wold – bordered to the west by the lovely and gracious city of Cheltenham. That’s more than enough for the time you have available, and Bath to Birmingham is less than two hours by train.
The Department of Health no longer requires a negative pre-departure test for travellers entering Australia. However the Department of Home Affairs requires us to complete a Digital Passenger Declaration that confirms our passport and vaccination certificate, but the government has that information. So why is the DPD required for Australian travellers? B. Nolan, Cremorne NSW
True that government departments have passport and vaccination information for Australians living in Australia but there’s more to it. For example those departments would have no vaccination record for Australians who live overseas and who may or may not have been vaccinated there. It is necessary to show evidence of a DPD when you check in for your flight to return to Australia but if check-in staff had to separate Australians domiciled overseas from those who are genuine residents, it gets complicated. Also, the DPD asks incoming passengers to identify which countries they have visited in the 14 days prior to arrival to determine whether they have been in an infection hotspot. It would not be in the national interest to allow Australians only to avoid that admission, therefore all must complete that DPD.
In October 2023 my wife and I are celebrating her birthday with our children and partners in the Dordogne. We’re looking at booking accommodation around Sarlat, thinking 8-10 adults. Any advice re accommodation, car hire and travel from Paris to Sarlat? E. Beck, Surrey Hills VIC
Take a look at Oliver’s Travels [oliverstravels.com], which specialises in upmarket European villas. Searching the Sarlat region I’m seeing half a dozen properties that would suit your group and I think you’d be perfectly happy with something like Le Prieure Esperance. However the Chateau de Cardou just a little to the west near Bergerac could be a contender if you need more room, and you don’t have to worry about the neighbours on the 150 hectare estate,
For car hire, try Rentalcars.com [rentalcars.com], they always seem to track down a better deal than I can, even as a loyal customer. What you might do is take a train from Paris to Bordeaux and pick up a hire car from there. The fastest trains from Paris Montparnasse take just over two hours. Limoges (3 hours 20 by train) is closer to your destination, but the choice of car-hire operators is smaller.
Got a travel question? Include your name and suburb or town and send it to Michael Gebicki – tripologist@traveller.com.au
Travel advice is general; readers should consider their personal circumstances.
Depending on where you’re headed, showing a vaccination card from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may not be enough. You may need to take extra steps before your trip to set up a “vaccine passport” that can be digitally verified.
With coronavirus travel restrictions significantly easing, there are a number of countries British tourists can now visit without taking a covid test.
But in what will likely come as a blow to some, Spain is not yet one of them. The nation has retracted earlier changes which had been announced to its coronavirus travel rules.
It was reported that Spain had loosened restrictions and was allowing unvaccinated Brits into the country just in time for the Easter holidays. But now, in a rare reversal, the Spanish tourist board in London has withdrawn the promise of opening up to unvaccinated British visitors.
READ MORE: Spain retracts latest covid travel update
Just hours after issuing the announcement, travellers were told the information provided was incorrect. The announcement resulted from an error of interpretation of the official state bulletin.
UK travellers aged 12 and above are still required to show proof of being fully vaccinated or a certificate of recovery (dated no more than 180 days previously). The only exception is for those aged 12 to 17 (inclusive) who can show a negative Covid test (PCR or similar) taken within the 72 hours before arriving in Spain.
The good news is there are currently 21 countries that don’t require unvaccinated or partially vaccinated travellers to test before arrival. Let’s take a look at places you can visit without having to prove you’ve been vaccinated, or take a test.
Ireland
If you are travelling to Ireland you do not need to show any proof of vaccination, proof of recovery, proof of negative test or Irish passenger locator form receipt. There are no post-arrival testing or quarantine requirements for travel to Ireland.
If you develop COVID-19 symptoms while in Ireland should follow the HSE guidance in relation to isolation and undertaking antigen or PCR testing as appropriate.
Poland
Since March 28, the obligation to undergo quarantine on arrival in Poland has been lifted. There is also no longer a requirement to demonstrate your vaccination status on arrival. A pre-departure test is no longer required for travellers arriving from non-Schengen countries, which includes the UK.
Sweden
As of April 1, people travelling to Sweden from the UK or other countries outside the EU/EEA will no longer be required to present a negative COVID-19 test or proof of vaccination.
Denmark
There are no COVID-19 related requirements regarding test or self-isolation when entering Denmark.
Mexico
Most visitors from the United Kingdom can enter Mexico without taking a test, as Mexico is open to travellers regardless of their vaccination status. Travellers are required to complete a Health Declaration Form and scan the QR code it generates on arrival.
Norway
Entry requirements for Norway are the same for all travellers, regardless of COVID-19 vaccination status. You don’t need to provide your vaccination status for entry to Norway.
Iceland
There are no COVID-19 related travel restrictions for Iceland.
Montenegro
You do not need to provide your vaccination status or a negative test result for entry to Montenegro.
Hungary
On March 7 all COVID-19 restrictions on entering Hungary were lifted. Hungary does not require any COVID-19 vaccination proof, or a negative test result to enter the country, regardless of your vaccination status.
Romania
All restrictions related to COVID-19 ceased on March 9. There is no longer a requirement to quarantine, to test before entering Romania, or to complete the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
Slovenia
You no longer need to provide proof of your vaccination status for entry to Slovenia.
Lithuania
British nationals travelling to Lithuania from the UK are no longer required to prove their vaccination status, recovery from COVID-19 or have a negative COVID-19 test result on arrival.
Madeira (Portugal)
It is recommended that you complete a passenger locator form before you travel to Madeira and Porto Santo. If you’re travelling with children aged 11 and under, include their details in your form. There are no other requirements for entry to Madeira and Porto Santo.
Cuba
As of April 6, there is no requirement for travellers arriving from the UK for either a COVID-19 vaccination certificate or a negative COVID-19 test. All travellers are required to complete a Health Declaration (Declaracíon Jurada de Sanidad) online before travel.
Costa Rica
Adults who are not fully-vaccinated can visit Costa Rica without taking a test as long as they have proof of travel insurance that covers lodging and medical expenses in case of contracting Covid-19. Anyone aged 18 or under, along with fully-vaccinated adults, can enter Costa Rica without mandatory insurance.
El Salvador
Most travellers can enter El Salvador without a negative test result and do not have to quarantine on arrival. You also do not need to be vaccinated, however, travellers are advised to bring proof of vaccination as this may be required for entry to specific events and premises.
Saudi Arabia
There is no requirement to provide a vaccination certificate or negative PCR or antigen test certificate to enter the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All visitors must fill out the Registration Immunization Information Form, and you will need a visa to enter or travel through Saudi Arabia.
Jordan
All travellers regardless of their vaccination status, are no longer required to conduct pre-departure PCR tests and PCR tests on arrival in Jordan. You will need a visa to enter or travel through Jordan as a visitor.
Latvia
If you travel to Latvia from EU, EEA countries, Switzerland or the UK, you are not required to show proof of vaccination, take COVID-19 tests or self-isolate when you arrive.
Moldova
All COVID-19 entry requirements were removed, both for Moldovans and foreign nationals, on March 22. Border Police will permit you to cross the Ukrainian-Moldovan checkpoint with a national ID card or a birth certificate.
Mongolia
COVID-19 related restrictions for entry have been lifted. Negative COVID-19 PCR tests before and after arrival are no longer required. You should contact the Mongolian Embassy in London for the most up-to-date advice on entry requirements and visas. Borders between China and Mongolia are closed except for freight traffic.
Receive newsletters with the latest news, sport and what’s on updates from the Liverpool ECHO by signing up here
Exotic travel might require yellow fever vaccine | Health | The Daily News Galveston County Daily News
Source link
this link is to an external site that may or may not meet accessibility guidelines.
(HealthDay)
TUESDAY, March 1, 2022 (HealthDay News) — Wanderlust has become a strong incentive for Americans to get COVID-19 vaccines, a new study finds.
The bucket list beckons, and “many people consider travel an essential part of their lifestyle and a contributor to their sense of well-being,” said study lead author Dogan Gursoy, a professor in hospitality business management at Washington State University.
“They’ll weigh the value of travel experiences they might miss by not being vaccinated against the vaccines’ possible risks,” Gursoy said in a university news release.
The study included more than 1,000 U.S. residents who were asked to rate their travel desire on a 5-point scale. Those with a strong travel desire were less likely to say they were concerned about potential vaccine side effects or long-term complications and were more likely to say they would get vaccinated.
Even among the 266 respondents who previously said they would not get vaccinated, their vaccine hesitancy weakened when a strong urge to travel was combined with messages about COVID vaccine safety and the potential consequences — including spreading the coronavirus to loved ones — of not getting vaccinated.
The findings about travel desire and vaccination intention were true even for people who didn’t have upcoming vacation plans or business trips, according to the study. The results appear in the journal Tourism Management.
Since early 2020, Gursoy has led efforts to track the pandemic’s effect on the hospitality and tourism industries. About 5,000 people have answered questions about vaccines in the past surveys, and about 30% consistently say they won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine.
These new findings could help guide the travel and tourism industry’s recovery from the pandemic, according to the researchers.
“Appealing to people’s longing for a vacation getaway could help overcome their vaccine hesitancy, resulting in higher vaccination rates and reductions in COVID-related travel restrictions and advisories,” Gursoy said.
SOURCE: Washington State University, news release, Feb. 25, 2022
Copyright © 2022 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
TUESDAY, March 1, 2022 (HealthDay News) — Wanderlust has become a strong incentive for Americans to get COVID-19 vaccines, a new study finds.
The bucket list beckons, and “many people consider travel an essential part of their lifestyle and a contributor to their sense of well-being,” said study lead author Dogan Gursoy, a professor in hospitality business management at Washington State University.
“They’ll weigh the value of travel experiences they might miss by not being vaccinated against the vaccines’ possible risks,” Gursoy said in a university news release.
The study included more than 1,000 U.S. residents who were asked to rate their travel desire on a 5-point scale. Those with a strong travel desire were less likely to say they were concerned about potential vaccine side effects or long-term complications and were more likely to say they would get vaccinated.
Even among the 266 respondents who previously said they would not get vaccinated, their vaccine hesitancy weakened when a strong urge to travel was combined with messages about COVID vaccine safety and the potential consequences — including spreading the coronavirus to loved ones — of not getting vaccinated.
The findings about travel desire and vaccination intention were true even for people who didn’t have upcoming vacation plans or business trips, according to the study. The results appear in the journal Tourism Management.
Since early 2020, Gursoy has led efforts to track the pandemic’s effect on the hospitality and tourism industries. About 5,000 people have answered questions about vaccines in the past surveys, and about 30% consistently say they won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine.
These new findings could help guide the travel and tourism industry’s recovery from the pandemic, according to the researchers.
“Appealing to people’s longing for a vacation getaway could help overcome their vaccine hesitancy, resulting in higher vaccination rates and reductions in COVID-related travel restrictions and advisories,” Gursoy said.
More information
For more on COVID-19 and travel, go to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
SOURCE: Washington State University, news release, Feb. 25, 2022
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
With in-flight and airport mask mandates slated to be lifted in the United States next month, a flight attendants’ union is pushing the Biden administration to extend the requirement until more people are vaccinated.
In a statement, the Association of Flight Attendants-C.W.A. said that the Transportation Security Administration’s plan to lift mask requirements on March 18 would endanger medically vulnerable travelers and passengers under 5, who have not been authorized by federal health authorities to get the vaccine.
“The layered approach to safety and security includes masks,” the union said in a statement on Tuesday.
If the mask mandate is rescinded next month as planned, it would come weeks after local and state authorities lifted mask mandates across the country as new coronavirus cases plummeted. The federal government regulates air travel, however, and so the mask requirements on airplanes have remained in place.
The Biden administration imposed the mask rule on flights a year ago during a brutal rise in cases across the country before vaccines were widely available. Those who did not comply were subjected to fines. Officials extended the mandate twice as deadly waves of the virus continues to wash over the nation.
On Tuesday night, Patricia Mancha, a spokeswoman for the T.S.A., said that the mask mandate was on track to expire on March 18, despite previous extensions. “If there is a change to halt or extend the mask requirement, we will make an announcement,” she said in an email. “As of now, nothing new to share.”
Many flight crews have faced that looming deadline with anxiety.
Disagreements over masks and the refusal of some passengers to wear them led to frequent shouting matches, fights and other problems with unruly passengers during the pandemic. From Jan. 1 to Feb. 15, the Federal Aviation Administration received nearly 400 reports of unruly passengers, including 255 reports of passengers refusing to comply with a federal mandate that they wear masks on planes.
Last month, a man on a Delta Air Lines flight from Dublin to New York who refused to wear his mask pulled down his pants and exposed his buttocks. Nearly two weeks later, an American Airlines flight to London from Miami turned around about an hour into its journey because of a passenger who refused to wear a mask.
Cases like those are why airline executives and the Association of Professional Flight Attendants have been urging the federal authorities to create a federal no-fly list for unruly passengers.
Still, many flight attendants support keeping the mask requirement. “It’s also critical that we maintain passenger confidence in the safety of air travel,” the union, which represents 50,000 flight attendants at 20 airlines, said in its statement.
Last week, the Republican attorney general of Texas sued to strike down the mask mandate on public transportation, including on planes and at airports.
Some airline executives have questioned the efficacy of masks on planes. At a Senate hearing in December, Gary Kelly, the chief executive of Southwest Airlines, said, “The case is very strong that masks don’t add much, if anything, in the air cabin environment.”
A few days later, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, urged travelers to wear face masks at airports and during flights.
Andrea Babinski never imagined she would be forced to get a vaccine to keep her nursing job.
“When people would say stuff like, ‘Oh, mask mandates today and slippery slope to vaccine mandates tomorrow,’ I thought, ‘No, that’s crazy. That sounds like a conspiracy theory, like wacko people,’” she said.
For the medical-surgical nurse who worked at Gundersen Health Systems for 12 years, it was never about politics. Due to several autoimmune issues, Babinski decided medically the shot was not the best decision for her.
She told me this over the phone, not from a hospital break room but from her home, because on Nov. 16, Babinski was fired from the La Crosse, Wisconsin hospital for declining to take a Covid shot.
Babinski isn’t an anomaly. She’s one of an untold number of health-care workers and other hospital staff across the country who have been denied basic informed consent where it should be valued most, and have thus either resigned or been fired for their private medical decisions.
Meanwhile, while the expert class, COVID hysterics, and even the president of the United States repeatedly rattle off talking points about overflowing ICUs and the “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” they ignore the real crisis plaguing hospitals and their role in creating it.
That crisis is a massively understaffed hospital system as qualified and willing-to-work medical personnel have been thanklessly terminated. Thanks to coercive vaccine mandates, which the U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld, hospitals are hemorrhaging employees and patients are not receiving care they desperately need.
Gundersen Health Systems illuminates this widespread problem. Thanks to bad reporting and a severe lack of transparency, this Wisconsin health system and its egregious management have flown under the radar.
Former Gundersen employees, who were terminated as a result of the mandate, know what life is like inside the hospital walls. They watched dirty laundry pile up and eventually be thrown away when there were no hands to tend to it. They saw the cafeteria whittle its offerings to PB&Js when there was nobody to staff it. They witnessed beds go unfilled because the qualified nurses who could have tended to ailing patients — and did unflinchingly through the most serious months of the pandemic — were fired for their personal medical decisions.
It started in August when Gundersen implemented a staff vaccine mandate, which employees first learned about not through the hospital but when it was leaked to the press. Gundersen’s official announcement was accompanied by the claim that about 85 percent of staff had already been vaccinated, a statistic the media uncritically parroted.
The problem is that it apparently wasn’t a real statistic. According to multiple former employees, the hospital didn’t learn about staff vaccination statuses until after touting that percentage. Babinski said staff members were threatened with termination if they didn’t report their vaccination status through Gundersen’s Covid Attestation Form by early September, weeks after the hospital had declared what percentage of staff had gotten the shot.
Gundersen did not respond to The Federalist’s inquiries about how it calculated 85 percent.
At the beginning of November, after the mandate deadline, Gundersen and local news reported “30 out of 9,000 employees terminated over vaccine rule,”and “62 resigned rather than receive COVID-19 vaccine.” Reports also noted that “[n]inety-nine percent of Gundersen staff are fully vaccinated or in the process of becoming fully vaccinated.”
But this also apparently wasn’t true. First, many people resigned long before the hospital began terminating, due to poor working conditions, low wages, and frustration with the mandate.
“It was like rats jumping off a sinking ship,” Babinski said. “We had hundreds of people that I [know] personally now … people that just quit leading up to the mandate. They were never given a chance to say the reason they quit, so I don’t know where they got their number.”
Many of these employees were people Babinski had gotten to know by rubbing shoulders with them at mandate-related protests. Others she connected with in a private Facebook group for Gundersen workers against mandatory vaccination, a group The Federalist confirmed has more than 600 members.
Gundersen also failed to grant exit interviews, according to former employees who were denied them and others who were simply never asked why they left. This means the hospital would have no way of knowing how many resignations were a result of vaccine refusal.
Worse, Gundersen was still actively hemorrhaging employees at that time, through continued terminations and resignations, meaning those early numbers are undercounted.
“That was a huge kick in the gut because a lot of us weren’t even fired yet,” Babinski told The Federalist, recounting what it was like to see those reports while knowing she wasn’t among the 30 but would soon be terminated.
Other metrics also indicate those numbers were dramatically undercounted.
For instance, take a look at the increase in job openings following the announcement of the vaccine mandate. Notice how the positions for CNAs within Gundersen Health Systems jumped from 53 in mid-September to 60 just a few weeks later. It’s also possible these postings are for multiple vacancies, meaning if there’s a need for six day-shift nurses in the cardio-pulmonary unit, for example, the job might only be listed once.
Since then, Gundersen’s vacancies have only continued to skyrocket. Postings for CNAs have now jumped to 85, and posted vacancies for nurses spiked from 89 after the mandate was announced to 141 as of Wednesday, a more than 58 percent increase that occurred mostly after the reports of only 30 terminations and 62 resignations
This staff hemorrhaging was on top of other worker shortages resulting from alleged poor wages and working conditions. Nursing staff watched as environmental assistants, who are responsible for custodial duties, left their posts in droves after their wages were lowered in 2021.
“Why work for Gundersen when you can easily make more money at Culvers, Kwik Trip or Walmart?” one RN wrote in a community impact statement. She had been granted a religious exemption but was so disgusted by the letter’s language that she resigned anyway. This RN reported that as a result of low-wage staff jumping ship, nurses had to use the bare minimum of linens, even going so far as to craft makeshift pillowcases out of hospital gowns.
“This shortage of low-wage staff had direct impacts on patient care. Patients would go without clean linens and towels,” David Anderson, who was a nurse in Gundersen’s Behavioral Health Unit for nearly a decade before being fired in November as a result of the vaccine mandate, told The Federalist.
“During one of my shifts as a charge nurse, my staff had to give patients washcloths to use as towels, because washcloths were the only clean laundry to be found,” he added. “Trashes around the hospital were overflowing, floors were dirty, and laundry sat in hampers for days with nobody to wash it — hospital laundry, festering with feces, urine, vomit, and blood. Tens of thousands of dollars of it had to be thrown away.”
Trying to mitigate these severe staffing shortages, Gundersen sought volunteers among its medical professionals to help with hospital cleaning, meaning that after it dropped wages for environmental assistants, nurses could make their normal rate of anywhere from $32 to $50 per hour for doing janitorial work.
The shortages extended to nurses as well, long before the vaccine mandate made them much worse.
“Within the hospital, nursing shortages have led to unsafe staffing situations where nurses and CNAs are being forced to take more patients than what is safe due to there not being enough nursing staff present. Patients are being forgotten on bed pans or are falling because there is simply not enough staff to safely take care of them,” wrote the RN who resigned after acquiring a religious exemption.
She said that one weekend in October, Gundersen had to shut down a dozen beds in the hospital due to nursing shortages. She added that the hospital has also canceled heart valve replacement surgeries because it didn’t have enough staff to take care of post-op patients.
“Now just imagine, if this is the current staffing reality at Gundersen, how much worse is it
going to get when Gundersen fires hundreds more in November due to the vaccine mandate?” she said.
As a result of the largely self-inflicted staffing crisis, Gundersen has been scrambling for workers and trying to find loopholes.
“We cannot simply create more RNs,” came the desperate email from corporate, reviewed by The Federalist, asking the hospital’s medical-surgical nurses to move shifts to plug holes. Even some terminated nurses were still on the open-shift texting list, which blew up non-stop with urgent requests.
Now Gundersen and other local hospitals, including Mayo Clinic Health System, are calling on the National Guard for help due to this self-imposed shortage of staff and thus beds — a shortage they’re simultaneously blaming on the vaccinated being out with the virus and unvaccinated staff who didn’t obey the mandate, a stunning lack of self-awareness.
“It’s been very challenging to try to staff the units with staff being out with Covid or not being compliant to being vaccinated,” said Renee Groth, a nurse manager at Mayo.
One nurse who worked at both Mayo and Gunderson throughout the pandemic told The Federalist that Mayo is even worse with its aggression toward unvaccinated employees. Gunderson is now throwing job offers to staff members who were fired or resigned from Mayo over the same types of mandates.
In an attempt to make up for the huge staffing holes, Gundersen is also bringing in travel nurses after kicking their own dedicated staff to the curb. It’s a convenient loophole for the hospital; after firing unvaccinated staff, it can then use unvaccinated travel nurses because they’re technically employed by a travel agency, not directly by Gundersen.
Many full-time nurses who lost their jobs have since become travel nurses or are considering doing so because they can maintain their medical freedom but still work — plus, travel nurses receive double or triple the wage rates of a normal nurse. This, of course, raises questions about what will happen to health care costs when prices are unnecessarily inflated.
This is all to be expected from hospitals that go along with absurd medical edicts from on high that they can see are decimating standards of care. When asked during a September leadership town hall about his plan to help departments that could lose upwards of 25 percent of their staff due to the vaccine mandate, Gundersen CEO Scott Rathgaber responded:
“Hear me say that if we have to decrease the ability to deliver services in order to preserve the staff that we have, we will do so in the short term until we can build that back up. … If we do have staffing shortages, we will have to adjust ultimately what services we can provide. … It’s as simple as math, and having enough people to do the work.”
In other words, if Gundersen had to turn needy patients away or shut down medical services in order to force performative morality through vaccine compliance, that was a price it was willing to pay. Except the hospital hasn’t ultimately paid it; its staff and patients have.
So are medical workers and patients across the rest of the country. Gundersen is just the tip of the iceberg.